When I was a kid, my parents and
grandparents would often give me a family lesson by showing me boxes of old
photos. “This is my great uncle John; he’s my mother’s
uncle from the Taylor side. You know, they were the ones that moved from the country
before I was born. Doesn’t he look like your cousins in Dublin?” I remember
thinking he really looked like the man that my fourth grade social studies
teacher told us drove the final spike in the transcontinental railroad, but to
say that would just be mean. Everyone in those old black and white photos
really looked like the only people they were related to were each other.
Those grainy old photos made everyone
look sweaty and sunburned. Their clothes were too big and if they were actually looking at the
camera, you would think all they really wanted was something to eat. But as detached
and indifferent as I was, the look on my relative’s faces when they viewed the
pictures was much different. These weren’t images of dust bowl farmers in a
text book; they were real individuals that my relatives knew personally. Loved
ones captured with the technology of the day. I didn’t want to be mean, but most
of the time I really didn’t feel much emotion and I had no Idea what to say.
As technology advanced, so did photography. There a few gray pictures (as my
daughter refers to them) of me as a child, but luckily most are in color. My
neighbor gave me an old camera when I was probably 10 years old, and while
color film was available, it was out of my price range. I wasn’t necessarily
the next Ansel Adams anyway and I stand by my parent’s decision not to pay good
money for the developing of pictures “snapped”
of the back of my brother’s head or vacation pictures of a car lot in North
Carolina. Pointing and clicking was cheap, but buying the film and having God
only knows what developed was not.
Affordable digital photography has
been nothing less than revolutionary. I can now take hundreds of photos and decide if I want them
or not in just a few seconds; I can re-take until I get what I want. I do feel sorry for those who have never experienced
the anticipation of driving to Revco to pick up a package of 24 unknown images
from a family vacation, fishing trip, litter of puppies and a few shots of the
nothing that it took to finish out the roll of film. But don’t get me wrong, I
wouldn’t go back to this for anything!
Since Facebook has become “the box of old photos in the attic” for
many, I can now anonymously scroll through thousands of old photos whenever I
choose. It is easy
to spot the digital photos from the scanned images taken from the real box, but
not necessarily in the obvious pixel count or color saturation. The old photos
are rarely perfect; someone is looking the wrong way; eyes are closed; the
group is off center or the lighting is wrong. “Take two just in case”. These photos were taken with the cross-your-fingers-and-pray-for-a-good-one
cameras of really not too long ago, but they are as real to me as the perfect
pictures of today. I knew these people and I love and miss them. Technology can’t
change everything.
Oh yes...I look at old photos and so wish that a better camera or better film had been used. These old photos are what we have...but definitely not all we have of those we miss.
ReplyDeleteMan, you captured the feeling of the time and the range of my emotions connected to so many of those old photos...Things I remember??? Maybe...Or I just remember having seen the pictures often enough, that I have transferred them to real-life experiences....I love this pic of Gus and can hardly stand to look at it...all at the same time...But so glad Sandy found it and brought it back to the front page...Love you, Pop
ReplyDeleteYou probably know that the picture of Gus that Sandy brought back was made me think of this. I love the picture too, but honestly it looks like somebody was cropped out of it! Or maybe they were taking a picture of the palm tree and he stepped in. Gone are the imperfections of the old ones; the new ones are sometimes too perfect.
ReplyDelete