I read an interesting
article in the waiting room of my wife’s doctor office a while back about a
lady that rescued and rehabilitated elephants and rhinos. I do use a smart
phone as a personal babysitter now, but sometimes it’s still fun to read a genuine,
old fashioned magazine article. I don’t consider myself an overly sentimental
person about things like this, but I have been known to pick up the handset of my
in-laws wall mounted rotary dial telephone and just listen to the dial tone; it
kind of makes me feel like a time traveler.
But back to what
I really wanted to talk about; the magazine article. I don’t remember the lady’s
name, but the things she has been able to do with wild animals was nothing
short of amazing. The focus was mainly on elephants and honestly I think this
has more to do with public sentiment than intelligence. Have you heard anyone
say “he has a memory like a rhino”? I
haven’t, but I have heard some item deemed rhino
tough. Two similar animals perceived in two very different ways. For
reasons unknown elephants are often thought of as both cuddly and romantic. I
can’t imagine Water For Rhinos ever being the literary success that Water
for Elephants turned out to be.
So why did
the section about rhinos interest me so? Was it due to the gravity of her finding
common ground with such an aggressive and unnatural beast? For the most part I
think so. I think we all tend to romanticize the notion that certain animals
have the ability for human thoughts and emotions and others don’t. These tend to
be the animals we love the most because we see them as more like us, but not us
like them. I know that I would rather
have a dog for a pet than say, a badger! I would choose the dog simply because
we would better understand one another from the beginning. We would be able to
reach certain agreements and even learn snippets of one another’s language. Let’s
just say that it would be easier for
us to be friends and that is the path I would choose.
When you take
out the animals and think about this scenario in the larger picture of human
relations, the same parallels apply. We often blur the lines between friendship,
understanding and tolerance and consider them one in the same. You remember the
old test you failed when you were accused of being a racist? The one where, in
the middle of defending your record on racism, you were asked “well, have you ever had a (insert minority
here until you get a winner) eat dinner at your house”? And your answer was “no I haven’t, and your mother has never
eaten with me either. And while I understand she is a bitch, I swear I have
nothing against her!” I say this to illustrate one point; no matter how
tolerate you consider yourself everyone will not pass your personal friends test. They don’t need to and
shouldn’t have to.
So instead
of wondering if someone will pass your friends test, you might want to consider
whether or not you are passing the tolerance test. We don’t all have to be
friends to simply get along and treat one another with respect. We don't have to party together after work, like the same music or eat the same foods; this is friendship, not understanding. But you never know, that person you
perceive as a rhino might be an elephant after all.
No comments:
Post a Comment