What exactly did we learn from the “housing crisis”? Well, we really didn’t learn
anything new; we were just reminded of principles that have been around for
hundreds of years. We were reminded of the importance of the principal of
supply and demand. Large supply-low price…low supply-large price. You can say
whatever you want to about the mortgage companies giving (because with all the
foreclosures and short sales giving
is what it turned out to be) the wrong people money, but really all they were
doing was increasing the demand. Throw in the fact that many of these borrowers
had no skin in the game and you had a recipe for disaster.
So how have we applied this lesson to
other facets of our life? What about how these principals apply to secondary education? I recently
read an article that expressed (I’m smart enough to know that the article was a
writer’s opinion) both presidential candidate’s views on how to approach paying
for a college education. Both sides were in favor of extending low interest
loans to qualified borrowers, but where the split occurred was on the
interpretation of acceptable risk. One side said risk whatever you had to to get
the education you are “entitled to” and the other side said “get as much
education as you can afford”. Naturally
the opposing side took the word afford to mean that only the rich will get a
college education, but unfortunately interpretation rules the airwaves!
But I think of it this way, and
before I go any further let me say that I thank God every day that “BS in Cowboy Science” wasn’t a degree choice when I was in college
because I would probably still be paying back the student loans for it. These are monumental decisions for a
teenager with room for great margins of error.
Buying what you can afford simply means
seeking advice from those with no financial interest in your life. If you ask your father if borrowing
$100K for a degree is a good idea I feel sure his answer will differ from the
one given by the person with the pen hovering over the documents. I’m not
saying either is automatically right, I’m just saying that the insight offered by
someone who has made financial decisions greater than which song to download
may be the advice that prevents you from making a decision that will alter the
course of your life for many years. I admit I was mad when, at eighteen years
old, my father drove me to the bank to borrow the $1000 I wanted for rims and a
paint job for my perfectly good car. But making those payments EVERY month to
the bank instead of “when I could” to
my father taught me a valuable lesson about decision making and value.
I will be the first to declare that
we need educated citizens. If we intend to continue being a world leader we must keep up with other
countries. But even the “unsuccessful”
will need tires for their cars and cabinets installed in their homes. Everyone’s
hair will need cutting and our meat must be sliced into marketable shapes and
wrapped in desirable packaging before anyone will purchase it. Fires will
always need to be extinguished and living without air conditioning…let’s just
say I choose not to at any cost. The ones who provide these and many other honorable
services can expect to live a life that holds as much joy as the doctor that delivers
their first grandchild. If you choose to place a price tag on happiness, some of
these “regular people” will make even
more money than the professionals they rely on for legal, medical and financial
advice. It takes all kinds.
As the availability of money (and bad
decision making) ruined the lives of many citizens who were “entitled to the American dream of home
ownership”, so can the ease and availability of money for those entitled to
an education. The
demand is great and the prices are high. The fact that the loan money is
available does not, in itself, make the borrowing of it a good decision. The
career path you finance may not be profitable by the time you graduate or, worse
yet, you may absolutely hate it; this is the risk you must assume as you make
the decision about what you can “afford”.
Ande, you have more common sense than all the Occupiers of the White House put together! This "tax the rich to give away to the entitled" in every aspect of society is killing America bit by bit. I do not resent wealthy people and have no desire to see how heavily they can be taxed to provide for ne'er do wells who don't believe they should WORK for everything they get. It is a fact as old as time, what one works for, one appreciates! Too bad so many bleeding-heard liberals don't understand that concept!
ReplyDelete